Inflation fluctuates. It is very unstable, and changes very frequently. The government came up with a system to calculate the changes in value, called the CPI (consumer price index.) This is to figure out the cost of the necessities of living – food, clothes, cars, electronics, etc. This system allows us to compare dollars from one year to another, in a way that shows us the constant dollar. Ten dollars now does not mean the same exact thing as 5 dollars 10 years ago. What we learned in class is to calculate what an item or amount of money is worth in a certain number of years in today’s worth. The CPI allows us to calculate what values were in the past.

Cost Year A/Cost Year B = CPI Year A/CPI Year B. This is long version of the equation. The shorter version that most people use, and is most useful is this:
Recent Dollars = Old Dollars (CPI of recent year/CPI of old year)
The government has calculated the CPI rates for us, and we can see that in the early 1900s, the CPI was in the tens, and the CPI today is about 218. There was a dramatic increase.
The government bureau that created all of these numbers is the Labor Statistics Bureau.
Below is the table showing the CPI that the LSB came up with:
| | | Year | Annual Average | Annual Percent Change (rate of inflation) | | 1913 | 9.9 | | | 1914 | 10.0 | 1.3% | | 1915 | 10.1 | 0.9% | | 1916 | 10.9 | 7.7% | | 1917 | 12.8 | 17.8% | | 1918 | 15.0 | 17.3% | | 1919 | 17.3 | 15.2% | | 1920 | 20.0 | 15.6% | | 1921 | 17.9 | -10.9% | | 1922 | 16.8 | -6.2% | | 1923 | 17.1 | 1.8% | | 1924 | 17.1 | 0.4% | | 1925 | 17.5 | 2.4% | | 1926 | 17.7 | 0.9% | | 1927 | 17.4 | -1.9% | | 1928 | 17.2 | -1.2% | | 1929 | 17.2 | 0.0% | | 1930 | 16.7 | -2.7% | | 1931 | 15.2 | -8.9% | | 1932 | 13.6 | -10.3% | | 1933 | 12.9 | -5.2% | | 1934 | 13.4 | 3.5% | | 1935 | 13.7 | 2.6% | | 1936 | 13.9 | 1.0% | | 1937 | 14.4 | 3.7% | | 1938 | 14.1 | -2.0% | | 1939 | 13.9 | -1.3% | | 1940 | 14.0 | 0.7% | | 1941 | 14.7 | 5.1% | | 1942 | 16.3 | 10.9% | | 1943 | 17.3 | 6.0% | | 1944 | 17.6 | 1.6% | | 1945 | 18.0 | 2.3% | | 1946 | 19.5 | 8.5% | | 1947 | 22.3 | 14.4% | | 1948 | 24.0 | 7.7% | | 1949 | 23.8 | -1.0% | | 1950 | 24.1 | 1.1% | | 1951 | 26.0 | 7.9% | | 1952 | 26.6 | 2.3% | | 1953 | 26.8 | 0.8% | | 1954 | 26.9 | 0.4% | | 1955 | 26.8 | -0.3% | | 1956 | 27.2 | 1.5% | | 1957 | 28.1 | 3.4% | | 1958 | 28.9 | 2.7% | | 1959 | 29.2 | 0.9% | | 1960 | 29.6 | 1.5% | | 1961 | 29.9 | 1.1% | | 1962 | 30.3 | 1.2% | | 1963 | 30.6 | 1.3% | | 1964 | 31.0 | 1.3% | | 1965 | 31.5 | 1.6% | | 1966 | 32.5 | 3.0% | | 1967 | 33.4 | 2.8% | | 1968 | 34.8 | 4.2% | | 1969 | 36.7 | 5.4% | | 1970 | 38.8 | 5.9% | | 1971 | 40.5 | 4.2% | | 1972 | 41.8 | 3.3% | | 1973 | 44.4 | 6.3% | | 1974 | 49.3 | 11.0% | | 1975 | 53.8 | 9.1% | | 1976 | 56.9 | 5.8% | | 1977 | 60.6 | 6.5% | | 1978 | 65.2 | 7.6% | | 1979 | 72.6 | 11.3% | | 1980 | 82.4 | 13.5% | | 1981 | 90.9 | 10.4% | | 1982 | 96.5 | 6.2% | | 1983 | 99.6 | 3.2% | | 1984 | 103.9 | 4.4% | | 1985 | 107.6 | 3.5% | | 1986 | 109.7 | 1.9% | | 1987 | 113.6 | 3.6% | | 1988 | 118.3 | 4.1% | | 1989 | 123.9 | 4.8% | | 1990 | 130.7 | 5.4% | | 1991 | 136.2 | 4.2% | | 1992 | 140.3 | 3.0% | | 1993 | 144.5 | 3.0% | | 1994 | 148.2 | 2.6% | | 1995 | 152.4 | 2.8% | | 1996 | 156.9 | 2.9% | | 1997 | 160.5 | 2.3% | | 1998 | 163.0 | 1.5% | | 1999 | 166.6 | 2.2% | | 2000 | 172.2 | 3.4% | | 2001 | 177.0 | 2.8% | | 2002 | 179.9 | 1.6% | | 2003 | 184.0 | 2.3% | | 2004 | 188.9 | 2.7% | | 2005 | 195.3 | 3.4% | | 2006 | 201.6 | 3.2% | | 2007 | 207.3 | 2.8% | | 2008 | 215.2 | 3.8% | | 2009 | 214.5 | -0.3% | | 2010 | 218.1 | 1.6% | | 2011* | 225.4 | 3.3% | |
Next scribe is Gil.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.